Summary
denying modification based on the wife's "substantial income" from property awarded to her in the dissolution and from investments made with cash awarded to her in the dissolution, because such income was "sufficiently foreseeable" at dissolution
Summary of this case from In re Marriage of WilliamsOpinion
89DMO243; CA A61359
Filed April 5, 1991
Brasch Bauder, North Bend, for motion.
Burch Burnett, P.C., Coquille, contra.
Husband moves the court for clarification of our opinion, 103 Or. App. 614, 798 P.2d 717 (1990), rev den 311 Or. 87 (1991). We allow the motion. The spousal support modification is effective as of the date of the appellate judgment, February 26, 1991.
Motion allowed; opinion clarified and adhered to as clarified.