From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smart Study Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Longteng Yunqi Trade Co., Ltd.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Dec 10, 2020
Civil 20-CV-6455(LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2020)

Opinion

Civil 20-CV-6455(LAK)

12-10-2020

SMART STRUDY CO., LTD., PALINTIFF v. BAUING LONTENG YUNQI TRADE CO., LTD., CLEVERKIDS STORE, DAFENG CLAIRE IMPORT AND EXPORT TRADING CO., LTD., CO., LTD., GIRLY STORE, HOPE TOYS (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD., JIANGMEN AOXIN TRADE CO., LTD., L&L PARENT CHILD OUTFIT 2 STORE, LIANYUNGANG HONGWEN FIREWORKS CO., LTD., LONGGANG JING'AN PAPER PRODUCTS CO., LTD., LONGYOU JIZHEN E-COMMERCE CO., LTD., LOVELYLIAN STORE, NANJING EXCELLENT EMBROIDERY CO., LTD., NINGBO MILUCKY CRAFTWORK CO., LTD., PAREHOPE WEDDING/PARTY DECOR STORE, QINGDAO BUZZY CULTURAL CO., LTD., QINGDAO FUBOYUAN ARTS & CRAFTS CO., LTD., ROOXIN WATER FUN STORE, SHANGHAI ROGER INDUSTRY LIMITED COMPANY, SHANTOU CHENGHAI HUA NUO INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., SHANTOU JIETAI CRAFTS&TOYS MANUFACTORY, SHENZHEN CHUANYIJINGPIN TOYS CO., LTD., SHENZHEN SSTC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., SHENZHEN TOMTOY PLASTIC ELECTRIC CO., LTD SHOP5365253 STORE, SHOP5485050 STORE, WENZHOU ZIGPAC INDUSTRY LIMITEDM YANGZHOU HONGLEI TOYS CO., LTD., YIWU CITY XINYANG IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD., YIWU GOOD CRAFTS CO., LTD., YIWU HOLDER CRAFT CO., LTD., YIWU JUNZHI TOYS CO., LTD., YIWU LOLLIPOP-PROFESSIONAL GARMENT FACTORY, YIWU MICROSTAR COMMODITIES CO., LTD., YIWU PARTY UNION IMP & EXP CO., LTD., YIWU RUIYI HOME SUPPLIES CO., LTD., YIWU RUIYI HOME SUPPLIES CO., LTD., YIWU RUOLIN E-COMMERCE FIRM, YIWU SUPERSTAR GIFT & TOYS CO., LTD., YIWU WUTONG CLOTHING FACTORY AND YIWU ZHIAO TRADING CO., LTD., DEFENDANTS

Jason M. Drangel (JD 7204) Ashly E. Sands (AS 7715) Brieanne Scully (BS 3711) Danielle S. Yamali (DY 4228) EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Smart Study Co., Ltd.


Jason M. Drangel (JD 7204) Ashly E. Sands (AS 7715) Brieanne Scully (BS 3711) Danielle S. Yamali (DY 4228) EPSTEIN DRANGEL LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Smart Study Co., Ltd.

[PROPOSED] 1) TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER; 2) ORDER RESTRAINING MERCHANT STOREFRONTS AND DEFENDANTS' ASSETS WITH THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS; 3) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE; 4) ORDER AUTHORIZING BIFURCATED AND ALTERNATIVE SERVICE; AND 5) ORDER AUTHORIZIN G EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

FILED UNDER SE AL

GLOSSARY

Term

Definition

Plaintiff or Smart

Smart Study Co., Ltd.

Defendants

Beijing Longteng Yunqi Trade Co., Ltd., Cleverkids Store, Dafeng Claire Import And Export Trading Co., Ltd., Foshan Golden Fairy Tale Clothing Co., Ltd., Girly Store, Hope Toys (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Jiahai (Dongguan) Technology Co., Ltd., Jiangmen Aoxin Trade Co., Ltd., L&L Parent Child Outfit 2 Store, Lianynngang Hongwen Toys Co., Ltd., Liuyang Bluewhale Fireworks Co., Ltd., Longgang Jing'an Paper Products Co., Ltd., Longyou Jizhen E-Connnerce Co., Ltd., LovelyLian Store, Nanjing Zhaoyan Trade Co., Ltd., Nanning Excellent Embroideiy Co., Ltd., Ningbo Hooray Crafts Co., Ltd., Nhigbo Milucky Craft\vork Co., Ltd., parehope Wedding/Pai"ty Decor Store, Qingdao Buzzy Cultural Co., Ltd., Qingdao Fuboynan Aits & Crafts Co., Ltd., Rooxin Water Fim Store, Shanghai Roger Industry Limited Company, Shantou Chenghai Hua Nuo Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., Shantou Jietai Crafts&Toys Manufactory, Shenzhen Chuanyijingpin Toys Co., Ltd., Shenzhen SSTC Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tomtoy Plastic Electric Co., Ltd, Shop5365253 Store, Shop5485O5O Store, Wenzhou Zigpac Industry Limited, Yangzhou Honglei Toys Co., Ltd., Yiwu City Xinyang Import And Export Co., Ltd., Yiwu Good Crafts Co., Ltd., Yiwu Hoder Crafts Co., Ltd., Yiwu Junzhi Toys Co., Ltd., Yiwu Lollipop-Professional Garment Factory, Yiwu Microstar Connnodities Co., Ltd., Yiwu Party Union Imp & Exp Co., Ltd., Yiwu Ruiyi Home Supplies Co., Ltd., Yiwu Ruolin E-Commerce Firm, Yiwu Superstar Gift & Toys Co., Ltd., Yiwu Wutong Clothing Factoiy and Yiwu Zhi Ao Trading Co., Ltd.

Alibaba

Alibaba.com, an online marketplace platform that allows manufacturers, wholesalers and other third-party merchants, like Defendants, to advertise, offer for sale, sell, distribute and ship their wholesale and retail products originating from China directly to consumers across the world and specifically to consumers residing in the U.S., including New York

AliExpress

Aliexpress.com, an online marketplace platform that allows manufacturers, wholesalers and other third-party merchants, like Defendants, to advertise, offer for sale, sell, distribute and ship their wholesale and retail products originating from China directly to consumers across the world and specifically to consumers residing in the U.S.. including New York

Epstein Drangel

Epstein Drangel LLP, counsel for Plaintiff

New York Address

244 Madison Ave, Suite 411, New York, NY 10016

Complaint

Plaintiff's Complaint filed on August 14, 2020

Application

Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for: 1) a temporary restraining order; 2) an order restraining Merchant Storefronts (as defined infra) and Defendants' Assets (as defined infra) with the Financial Institutions (as defined infra); 3) an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue; 4) an order authorizing bifurcated and alternative service and 5) an order authorizing expedited discovery filed on August 14, 2020

Yang Dec.

Declaration of Su Jeong Yang in Support of Plaintiff's Application

Yamali Dec.

Declaration of Danielle S. Yamali in Support of Plaintiff's Application

Baby Shark Content

One of Smart's most successful creations, which is the Pinkfong “Baby Shark” song and viral music video with characters

Baby Shark Applications

U.S. Trademark Serial Application Nos.: 79/253, 035 for registration of “BABY SHARK” for a variety of goods in Classes 41, 25, 16 and 9; 79/252, 869 for registration of Pinkfong for a variety of goods in Class 41; 79/249, 403 for registration of “PINKFONG BABY SHARK” for a variety of goods in Classes 24 and 21; 88/396, 786 for registration of “PINKFONG BABY SHARK” for a variety of goods in Class 25; 88/529, 984 for registration of “PINKFONG” for a variety of goods in Class 2, 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 41; 88/530, 086 for registration of “BABY SHARK” for a variety of goods in Class 2, 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 41; 88/594, 141 for “PINKFONG” for a variety of goods in Class 5; and 88/594, 122 for “BABY SHARK” for a variety of goods in Class 5

Baby Shark Registrations

U.S. Trademark Registration Nos.: 5, 803, 108 for “BABY SHARK” for a variety of goods in Class 28; 5, 483, 744 for “PINKFONG” for a variety of goods in Classes 3 and 21; 5, 327, 527 for “PINKFONG” for a variety of goods in Classes 9, 16 and 28; 4, 993, 122 for “PINKFONG” a variety of goods in Classes 9 and 25; Pinkfong Baby Shark for and 6, 021, 523 for or a variety of goods in Class 28

Baby Shark Marks

The Baby Shark Registrations and Baby Shark Applications

Baby Shark Works

U.S. Copyright Registration Nos.: VA 2-130-856, covering Baby Shark; VA 2-130-847, covering Daddy Shark; VA 2-130-854, covering Mommy Shark; VA 2-131-983, covering Pink Fong Mascot; SR 823-609, covering Baby Shark (Sound Recording and Music); PA 2-142-905, covering Baby Shark (Motion Picture)

Baby Shark Products

Smart has developed and initiated an extensive worldwide licensing program for a wide variety of consumer products such as toys, sound books, t-shirts, associated with and/or related to the Baby Shark Content

Counterfeit Products

Products bearing or used in connection with the Baby Shark Marks and/or Baby Shark Works, and/or products in packaging and/or containing labels and/or hang tags bearing the Baby Shark Marks and/or Baby Shark Works, and/or bearing or used in connection with marks and/or artwork that are confusingly or substantially similar to the Baby Shark Marks and/or Baby Shark Works and/or products that are identical or confusingly or substantially similar to the Baby Shark Products

Infringing Listings

Defendants' listings for Counterfeit Products

User Accounts

Any and all websites and any and all accounts with online marketplace platforms such as Alibaba and/or AliExpress, as well as any and all as yet undiscovered accounts with additional online marketplace platforms held by or associated with Defendants, their respective officers, employees, agents, servants and all persons in active concert or participation with any of them

Merchant Storefronts

Any and all User Accounts through which Defendants, their respective officers, employees, agents, servants and all persons in active concert or participation with any of them operate storefronts to manufacture, import, export, advertise, market, promote, distribute, display, offer for sale, sell and/or otherwise deal in Counterfeit Products, which are held by or associated with Defendants, their respective officers, employees, agents, servants and all persons in active concert or participation with any of them

Defendants' Assets

Any and all money, securities or other property or assets of Defendants (whether said assets are located in the U.S. or abroad)

Defendants' Financial Accounts

Any and all financial accounts associated with or utilized by any Defendants or any Defendants' User Accounts or Merchant Storefront(s) (whether said account is located in the U.S. or abroad)

Financial Institutions

Any banks, financial institutions, credit card companies and payment processing agencies, such as PayPal Inc. (“PayPal”), Payoneer Inc. (“Payoneer”), the Alibaba Group d/b/a Alibaba.com payment services (e.g., Alipay.com Co., Ltd., Ant Financial Services Group), PingPong Global Solutions, Inc. (“PingPong”) and other companies or agencies that engage in the processing or transfer of money and/or real or personal property of Defendants

Third Party Service Providers

Online marketplace platforms, including, without limitation, those owned and operated, directly or indirectly by Alibaba and/or AliExpress, as well as any and all as yet undiscovered online marketplace platforms and/or entities through which Defendants, their respective officers, employees, agents, servants and all persons in active concert or participation with any of them manufacture, import, export, advertise, market, promote, distribute, offer for sale, sell and/or otherwise deal in Counterfeit Products which are hereinafter identified as a result of any order entered in this action, or otherwise

On this day, the Court considered Plaintiffs ex parte application for the following: 1) a temporary restraining order; 2) an order restraining Merchant Storefronts and. Defendants' Assets with the Financial Institutions; 3) an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue; 4) an order authorizing bifurcated and alternative service and 5) an order authorizing expedited discovery against Defendants, Third Party Service Providers and Financial Institutions in light of Defendants' intentional and willful offerings for sale and/or sales of Counterfeit Products. A complete list of Defendants is attached hereto as Schedule A, which also includes links to Defendants 'Merchant Storefronts and infringing Listings. Having reviewed the Application, Declarations of Su Jeong Yang and Danielle S. Yamali, along with exhibits attached thereto and other evidence submitted in support thereof) the Court makes the following findings of fact, and conclusions of law:

Where a defined term is referenced herein and not defined herein, the defined term should be understood as it is defined in the Glossary.

FACTUAL FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. Smart is a global entertainment company specializing in developing animated and gaming content to deliver high-quality entertainment. Headquartered in Seoul, South Korea, Smart currently has over 200 employees and offices in Los Angeles, Shanghai and Hong Kong. Smart has developed award-winning brands including “Pinkfong”, “Monster Super League”, ‘ JellyKing and “Tamago Monsters”.

2. Through Smart's preschool brand, Pinkfong, the company produces modern-day songs and stories to provide stimulating and fon learning.experiences to children. One of Smart's most successful creations is the Pinkfong “Baby Shark” song and viral music video with characters, which to date has amassed nearly 3.1 billion views on YouTube and debuted at No. 32 on the Billboard Hot 100 Chart.

3. Smart has developed and initiated an extensive worldwide licensing program for a wide variety of consumer products such as toys, sound books and t-shirts associated with and/or related to the BABY SHARK and PINKFONG trademarks and the Baby Shark Content.

4. While Plaintiff has gained significant common law trademark and other rights in its Baby Shark Content and Baby Shark Products, through use, advertising and promotion,

Plaintiff has. also protected its valuable rights by filing for and obtaining federal trademark registrations.

5. For example, Plaintiff owns the Baby Shark Marks, including U.S. Trademark Registrations Nos.: 5, 803, 108 for “BABY SHARK” for a variety of goods in Class 28; 5, 483, 744 for “PINKFONG” for a variety of goods in Classes 3 and 21; 5, 327, 527 for “PINKFONG” for a variety of goods in Classes 9, 16 and 28; 4, 993, 122 for “PINKFONG” a variety of goods in Classes 9 and 25; and 6, 021, 523 for Pinkfong Baby Shark for a variety of goods in Class 28. Additionally, Plaintiff also owns U.S. Trademark Serial Application Nos.: 79/253, 035 for registration of “BABY SHARK” for a variety of goods in Classes 41, 25, 16 and 9; 79/252, 869 for registration of Pinkfong for a variety of goods in Class 41; 79/249, 403 for registration of “PINKFONG BABY SHARK” for a variety of goods in Classes 24 and 21;. 88/396, 786 for registration of “PINKFONG BABY SHARK” for a variety of goods in Class 25; 88/529, 984 for registration of “PINKFONG” for a variety of goods in Class i, 3, 9, 14, 1.6, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 41; No. 88/530, 086 for registration of “BABY SHARK” for a variety of goods in Class 2, 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 41; 88/594, 141 for “PINKFONG” for a variety of goods in Class 5; and 88/594, 122 for “BABY SHARK” for a variety of goods in Class 5.

6. The Baby Shark Marks are currently in use in commerce in connection with the Baby Shark Content and Baby Shark Products.

7. In addition, Plaintiff also owns the registered copyrights related to the Baby Shark Content and Baby Shark Products, For example, Plaintiff owns the Baby Shark Works, including U.S. Copyright Registrations Nos.: VA 2-130-856, covering Baby Shark; VA 2-130-847, covering Daddy Shark; VA 2-130-854, covering Mommy Shark; VA 2-131-983, covering Pink Fong Mascot; SR 823-609, covering Baby Shark (Sound Recording and Music); PA 2-142-905,' covering Baby Shark (Motion Picture).

8. Defendants are manufacturing, importing, exporting, advertising, marketing, promoting, distributing, displaying, offering for sale or Counterfeit Product through Defendants User Accounts and Merchant Storefronts with Alibaba and AliExpress (see Schedule A for links to Defendants' Merchant Storefronts and Infringing Listings);

9. Defendants are not, nor have they ever been, authorized distributors or licensees of the Baby Shark Products. Neither Plaintiff, nor any of Plaintiff's authorized agents, have consented to Defendants' use of the Baby Shark Works and/or Baby Shark Marks, nor has Plaintiff consented to Defendants' use of marks and/or artwork that are confusingly and/or substantially similar to, identical to and constitute a counterfeiting or infringement of the Baby Shark Works and/or Baby Shark Marks;

10. Plaintiff is likely to prevail on its Lanham Act, copyright and related common law claims at trial;

11. As a result of Defendants'' infringements, Plaintiff, as well as consumers, are likely to suffer immediate and irreparable losses, damages and injuries before Defendants can be heard in opposition, unless Plaintiff's Application for ex parte relief is granted:

a. Defendants have offered for sale and sold substandard Counterfeit Products that infringe the Baby Shark Works and/or Baby Shark Marks;
b. Plaintiff has well-founded fears that more Counterfeit Products will appear m the marketplace; that consumers may be misled, confused and disappointed by the quality
of these Counterfeit Products, resulting in injury to Plaintiffs reputation and:goodwill; and that Plaintiff may suffer loss of sales for its Baby Shark. Products; and
c. Plaintiff has well-founded fears that if it proceeds on notice to Defendants on this Application, Defendants will: (i) secret, conceal, destroy, alter, sell-off, transfer or otherwise dispose of or deal with Counterfeit Products or other goods that infringe the Baby Shark Works and/or Baby Shark Marks, the means of obtaining or manufacturing such Counterfeit Products, and records relating thereto that are in their possession or under their control, (ii) inform their suppliers and others of Plaintiffs claims with the result being that those suppliers and others may also secret, conceal,
sell-off or otherwise dispose of Counterfeit Products or other goods infringing the Baby Shark Works and/or Baby Shark Marks, the means of obtaining or manufacturing such Counterfeit Products, and records relating thereto that are in their possession or under their control, (iii) secret, conceal, transfer or otherwise dispose of their ill-gotten proceeds from its sales of Counterfeit Products or other goods infringing the Baby Shark Works and/or Baby Shark Marks and records relating thereto that are in their possession or under their control and/or (iv) open new User Accounts and Merchant Storefront under new or different names and continue to offer for sale and sell Counterfeit Products with little to no consequence;

12. The balance of potential harm to Defendants of being prevented from continuing to profit from their illegal and infringing activities if a temporary restraining order is issued is far outweighed by the potential harm to Plaintiff, its.business, the goodwill and reputation built up m and associated, with the Baby Shark Works and/or Baby Shark Marks and to its reputations if a temporary restraining order is not issued;

13. Public interest favors issuance of the temporary restraining order in order to protect. Plaintiffs interests in and to its Baby Shark Works and/or Baby Shark Marks, and to protect the public from being deceived and defrauded by Defendants' passing off of their substandard Counterfeit Products as Baby Shark Products;

14. Plaintiff has not publicized its request for a temporary restraining order in any way;

15. Service on Defendants via electronic means is reasonably calculated to result, in proper notice to Defendants.

16. If Defendants are given notice of the Application, they are likely to secret, conceal, transfer or otherwise dispose of their ill-gotten proceeds from their sales of Counterfeit Products or other goods infringing the Baby Shark Works and/or Baby Shark Marks. Therefore, good cause exists for granting Plaintiffs request for an asset restraining order. It typically takes the Financial; Institutions a minimum of five (5) days after service of the Order to locate, attach and freeze Defendants' Assets and/or Defendants' Financial Accounts and it is anticipated that it will take the Third Party Service Providers a minimum of five (5) days to freeze Defendants Merchant Storefronts. As such, the Court allows enough time for Plaintiff to serve the Financial Institutions and Third Party Service Providers with this Order, and for the Financial Institutions and Thud Party Service Providers to comply with the Paragraphs 1(B)(1) through 1(B)(2) and 1(C)(1) of this Order, respectively, before requiring service on Defendants.

17. Similarly, if Defendants are given notice of the Application, they are likely to destroy, move, hide or otherwise make inaccessible to Plaintiff the records and documents relating to Defendants' manufacturing, importing,, exporting, advertising, marketing, promoting, distributing, displaying, offering for sale and/or sale of Counterfeit Products. Therefore Plaintiff has good cause to be granted expedited discovery.

ORDER

Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, Plaintiffs Application is hereby GRANTED as follows:

I. Temporary Restraining Order

A IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, as sufficient cause has been shown, that Defendants are hereby restrained and enjoined from, engaging in any of the following acts or omissions for fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, and for such further period as may be provided by order of the Court:

1) manufacturing, importing, exporting, advertising, marketing, promoting, distributing, displaying, offering for sale, selling and/or otherwise dealing in Counterfeit Products, or any other products bearing the Baby Shark Works and/or Baby Shark Marks and/or marks and/or artwork that are confusingly and/or substantially similar to, identical to and constitute a counterfeiting or infringement of the Baby Shark Works and/or Baby Shark Marks:

2) directly or indirectly infringing in any manner Plaintiff s Baby Shark Marks and Baby Shark Works;

3) using any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation of Plaintiffs Baby Shark Marks and Baby Shark Works, to identify any goods or service not authorized by Plaintiff;

4) using Plaintiff's Baby Shark Marks and/or Baby Shark Works and/or any other marks that are confusingly similar to the Baby Shark Marks and/or any other artwork that is substantially similar to the Baby Shark Works, on or in connection with Defendants' manufacturing, importing, exporting, advertising, marketing, promoting, distributing, offering for sale, selling and/or otherwise dealing in Counterfeit Products;

5) using any false designation of origin or false description, or engaging m any action, which is likely to cause confusion, cause mistake and/or to deceive members of the trade and/or the public as to the affiliation, connection or association of any product manufactured, imported, exported, advertised, marketed, promoted, distributed, displayed, offered for sale or sold by Defendants with Plaintiff, and/or as to the origin, sponsorship or approval of any product manufactured, imported, exported, advertised, marketed, promoted, distributed, displayed, offered for sale or sold by Defendants and Defendants' commercial activities and Plaintiff;

6) secreting, concealing, destroying, altering, selling off,, transferring or otherwise disposing of and/or dealing with: (i) Counterfeit Products and/or (ii) any computer files, data, business records, documents or any other records or evidence relating to their User Accounts, Merchant Storefronts or Defendants' Assets and the manufacture, importation, exportation, advertising, marketing, promotion, distribution, display, offering for sale and/or sale of Counterfeit Products,

7) effecting assignments or transfers, forming new entities or associations, or creating and/or utilizing any other platform, User Account, Merchant Storefront or any other means of importation, exportation, advertising, marketing, promotion, distribution, display, offering for sale and/or sale of Counterfeit Products for the purposes of circumventing or otherwise avoiding the prohibitions set forth in this Order; and

8) knowingly instructing any other person or business entity to engage in any of the activities referred to in subparagraphs 1(A)(1) through 1(A)(7) above and 1(B)(1) through 1(B)(2) and 1(C)(1) below.

B. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, as sufficient cause has been shown, that the Third Party Service Providers and Financial Institutions are hereby restrained and enjoined from engaging in any of the following acts or omissions for fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, and for such further period as may be provided by order of the Court:

1) secreting, concealing, transferring, disposing of, withdrawing, encumbering or paying Defendants' Assets from or to Defendants' Financial Accounts until further ordered by this Court;
2) secreting, concealing, destroying, altering, selling off, transferring or otherwise disposing of and/or dealing with any computer files, data, business records, documents or any other records or evidence relating to Defendants' Assets and Defendants' Financial Accounts;
and
3) knowingly instructing any person or business entity to engage in any of the activities referred to in subparagraphs 1(A)(1) through 1(A)(7) and 1(B)(1) through 1(B)(2) above and 1(C)(1) below.

C. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, as sufficient cause has been shown, that the Third Party Service Providers are hereby restrained and enjoined from engaging in any of the following acts or omissions for fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, and for such further period as may be provided by order of the Court:

1) within five (5) days after receipt of service of this Order, providing services to Defendants, Defendants' User Accounts and Defendants' Merchant Storefronts, including, without limitation, continued operation of Defendants' User Accounts and Merchant Storefronts;
and
2) knowingly instructing any other person or business entity to engage in any of the activities referred to in subparagraphs 1(A)(1) through 1(A)(7), 1(B)(1) through 1(B)(2) and 1(C)(1) above.

II. Order to Show Cause Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue And Order Of Notice

A. Defendants are hereby ORDERED to show cause before tills Court on Dec. 23, 2020 at by 5: 00 pm. or at such other time that this Court deems appropriate, why a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(a), should not issue.

B. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that opposing papers, if any, shall be filed electronically with the Court on or before Dec. 19, 2020. Plaintiff shall file any Reply papers on or before Dec. 23, 2020.

C. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are hereby given notice that failure to XXXXX may result in the imposition of a preliminary injunction, against them pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, which may take effect immediately upon die expiration of this Order, and may extend throughout the length of the litigation under the same terms and conditions set forth in this Order.

III. Asset Restraining Order

A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 64 and 65 and N.Y. C.P.L.R. 6201 and this Court's inherent equitable power to issue provisional remedies ancillary to its authority to provide final equitable relief, as sufficient cause has been shown, that within five (5) days of receipt of service of this Order, the Financial Institutions shall locate and attach Defendants' Financial Accounts and shall provide written confirmation of such attachment to Plaintiffs counsel,

IV. Order Authorizing Bifurcated and Alternative Service by Electronic Means

A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(f)(3), as sufficient cause has been shown, that service may be made on, and shall be deemed effective as to Defendants if it is completed by the following means:;

1) delivery of (i) PDF copies of this Order together with the Summons and Complaint, or (ii) a link to a secure website (including NutStore, a large mail link created through Rmail.com and via website publication through a specific page .dedicated to this Lawsuit accessible through ipcounselorslawsuit.com) where each Defendant will be able to download PDF copies of this Order together with the Summons and Complaint, and all papers filed in support of Plaintiff's Application seeking this Order to Defendants' e-mail addresses to be determined after having been identified in Schedule A or may otherwise be determined; or
2) delivery of a message to Defendants through the same means that Plaintiffs agents have previously communicated with Defendants, namely the system for communications established by the Third Party Service Providers on their respective platforms, notifying Defendants that an action has been filed against them in this Court and providing a fink to a secure website (such as NutStore or a large mail link created through Rmail.com) where each Defendant will be able to download PDF copies of this Order together with the Summons and Complaint, and all papers filed in support of Plaintiff s Application seeking this Order.

B. IT' IS FURTHER ORDERED, as sufficient cause has been shown, that such alternative service by electronic means ordered herein shall be deemed effective as to Defendants, Third Party Service Providers and Financial Institutions through the pendency of this action.

C. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, as sufficient cause has been shown, that such alternative service by electronic means ordered herein shall be made within five (5) days of the Financial Institutions and Third Party Service Providers' compliance with Paragraphs 111(A) and V(C) of this Order.

D. TT IS FURTHER ORDERED, as sufficient cause has been shown, that the Clerk of the Court shall issue a single original summons in the name of “Beijing Longteng Yunqi Trade Co., Ltd and all other Defendants identified in the Complaint'' that will apply to all Defendants.

E. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, as sufficient cause has been shown, that service may be made and shall be deemed effective as to the following if it is completed by the below means:

1) delivery of: (i) a PDF copy of this Order, or (ii) a link to a secure website where PayPal Inc. will be able to download a PDF copy of this Order via electronic mail to PayPal Legal Specialist al EEOMALegaI.Specialist@paypal.com;

2) delivery of: (i) a PDF copy of this Order, - or (ii) a link to a secure website where AliPay.com Co., Ltd., Ant Financial Services will be able to download a PDF copy of this Order via electronic mail Mr. Di Zhang, Member of the Legal & Compliance Department__IP, at di.zd@alipay.com;

3) delivery of: (i) a PDF copy of this Order, or (ii) a link to a secure website where Alibaba will be able to download a PDF copy of this Order via electronic mail to Ms. Rachel Wang, Legal Counsel, Alibaba Group at rachel.wy@alibaba-inc.com and Ms. Yujuan He, Paralegal, Alibaba Group at chloe.he@alibaba-inc.com;

4) delivery of; (i) a PDF copy of this Order, or (ii) a link to a secure website where Payoneer Inc. will be. able to download a PDF copy of this Order via electronic mail to Payoneer Inc 'S Customer Service Management at customerservicemanager@payoneer.com and Edward Tulin, counsel for Payoneer Inc., at Edward.Tulin@skadden.com; and

5) delivery of: (i) a PDF copy of this Order, or (ii) a link to a secure website where PingPong Global Solutions Inc. will be able to download a PDF copy of this Order via electronic mail to PingPong Global Solutions Inc.'s Legal Department at legal@pingpongx.com.

V. Order Authorizing Expedited Discovery

A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, as sufficient cause has been shown, that:

1) Within fourteen (14) days after receiving service of this Order, each Defendant shall serve upon Plaintiffs counsel a written report under oath providing:

a. their true name and physical address;
b. the name and location and URL of any and all websites that Defendants own and/or operate and the name location, account numbers and URL for any and all User Accounts and Merchant Storefronts on any Third Party Service Provider platform that Defendants own and/or operate;
c. the complete sales records for any and all sales of Counterfeit Products, including but not limited to number of units sold, the price per unit, total gross revenues received (in U.S. dollars) and the dates thereof;
d. the account details, for any and all of Defendants' Financial Accounts, including, but not limited to, the account numbers and current account balances; and e. the steps taken by each Defendant, or other person served to comply with Section I, above.

2) Plaintiff may serve interrogatories pursuant to Rules 26 and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as well as Local Civil Rule 33.3 of the Local Rules for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and Defendants who are served with this Order shall provide written responses under oath to such interrogatories within fourteen (14) days of service to Plaintiffs counsel.

3) Plaintiff may serve requests for the production of documents pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 and 34. and Defendants who are served with this Order and the requests for the production of documents shall produce all documents responsive to such requests within fourteen (14). days of service to Plaintiff s counsel.

B. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, as sufficient cause has been shown, that within five (5) days of receipt of service of this Order the Financial Institutions shall identify any and all of Defendants' Financial Accounts, and provide Plaintiff's counsel with a summary report containing account details for any and all such accounts, which shall include, at a minimum, identifying information for Defendants, including contact information for Defendants (including, but not limited to, mailing addresses and e-mail addresses), account numbers and; account balances for any and all of Defendants' Financial Accounts and confirmation of said compliance with, this Order.

C. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, as sufficient cause has been shown, that within five (5) days of receipt of service of this Order, the Third Party Service Providers shah identify any and all of Defendants' User Accounts and Merchant Storefronts, and provide Plaintiff's counsel with a Summary report containing account details for any and all User Accounts arid Merchant Storefronts, which shall include, at a minimum, identifying information for Defendants and Defendants' User Accounts and Defendants' Merchant Storefronts, contact information for Defendants (including, but not limited to, mailing addresses and e-mail addresses) and confirmation of said compliance with, this Order.

D. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, as sufficient cause has been shown, that:

1) Within fourteen (14) days of receiving actual notice of this Order, all Financial Institutions who are served with this Order shall provide Plaintiffs counsel all documents and records in their, possession, custody or control (whether located in the U.S. or abroad) relating to any and all of Defendants' Financial Accounts, including, but not limited to, documents and records relating to;

a. account numbers;
b. current, account balances;
c. any and all identifying information for Defendants, Defendants' User Accounts and Defendants' Merchant Storefronts, including, but not limited to, names, addresses and contact information;
d. any and all account opening documents and records, including, but not limited to, account applications, signature cards, identification documents and if a business entity, any and all business documents provided for the opening of each and every of Defendants' Financial Accounts;
e. any and all deposits and withdrawals during the previous year from each and every one of Defendants' Financial Accounts and any and all supporting documentation, including, but not limited to, deposit slips, withdrawal slips, cancelled checks and account statements; and
f. any and all wire transfers into each and every one of Defendants' Financial Accounts during the previous year, including, but not limited to, documents sufficient to show the identity of the destination of the transferred funds, the identity of the beneficiary's bank and the beneficiary's account number.

E. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, as sufficient cause has been shown, that:

1) Within fourteen (14) days of receipt of service of this Order, the Third Party Service Providers shall provide to Plaintiffs counsel all. documents and records in its possession, custody or control (whether located in the U.S: or abroad) relating to Defendants' User Accounts and Defendants' Merchant Storefronts, including, but not limited to, documents and records relating to:

a. any and all User Accounts and Defendants' Merchant Storefronts and account details, including, without limitation, identifying information and account numbers for any and all User Accounts and Defendants' Merchant Storefronts that
Defendants have ever had and/or currently maintain with the Third Party Service Providers that were not previously provided pursuant to Paragraph V(C);
b. the identities, location and contact information, including any and all e-mail addresses of Defendants that were not previously provided pursuant to Paragraph V(C);
c. the nature of Defendants' businesses and operations, methods of payment, methods for accepting payment and any and all financial information, including, but not limited to, information associated with Defendants' User Accounts and Defendants' Merchant Storefronts, a foil accounting of Defendants' sales history and listing history under such accounts and Defendants' Financial Accounts with any and all Financial Institutions associated with Defendants' User Accounts and Defendants' Merchant Storefronts; and
d. Defendants' manufacturing, importing, exporting, advertising, marketing, promoting, distributing, displaying, offering for sale and/or selling of Counterfeit Products, or any other products bearing the Baby Shark Marks and/or Baby Shark Works and/or marks and/or artwork that are confusingly and/or substantially similar to, identical to and constitute an infringement of the Baby Shark Marks and/or Baby Shark Works.

VI. Security Bond

A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall place security in the amount of Ten Thousand Dollars (10, 000-) with the Court which amount is determined adequate for the payment of any damages any person may be entitled to recover as a result of an improper or wrongful restraint ordered hereunder.

VII. Seating Order

A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Complaint and exhibits attached thereto, and Plaintiffs ex parte Application and the Declarations of Jessica Amaiz, You Jae Kang and Brieanne Scully in support thereof and exhibits attached thereto and this Order shall remain sealed until the Financial Institutions and Third Party Service Providers comply with Paragraphs I(B)-(C), 111(A) and V(C) of this Order.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smart Study Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Longteng Yunqi Trade Co., Ltd.

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Dec 10, 2020
Civil 20-CV-6455(LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Smart Study Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Longteng Yunqi Trade Co., Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:SMART STRUDY CO., LTD., PALINTIFF v. BAUING LONTENG YUNQI TRADE CO., LTD.…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Dec 10, 2020

Citations

Civil 20-CV-6455(LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2020)