From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smart Modular Techs., Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 14, 2017
2016-2666 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2666 2016-2667

11-14-2017

SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant v. NETLIST, INC., Appellee

MICHAEL FRANCIS HEAFEY, Troutman Sanders LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANUP M. SHAH, Charlotte, NC. THOMAS J. WIMBISCUS, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by WAYNE BRADLEY, SCOTT P. MCBRIDE, GREGORY SCHODDE, RONALD SPUHLER.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2014-01372, IPR2014-01374.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL FRANCIS HEAFEY, Troutman Sanders LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANUP M. SHAH, Charlotte, NC. THOMAS J. WIMBISCUS, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by WAYNE BRADLEY, SCOTT P. MCBRIDE, GREGORY SCHODDE, RONALD SPUHLER. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 14, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Smart Modular Techs., Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 14, 2017
2016-2666 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2017)
Case details for

Smart Modular Techs., Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant v. NETLIST, INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 14, 2017

Citations

2016-2666 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2017)