From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smallwood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 9, 2016
202 So. 3d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D15–1834.

11-09-2016

Cedric Tyrone SMALLWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Busharis, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Busharis, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises a number of challenges to his convictions and sentences for robbery with a firearm and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We find it unnecessary to reach the Confrontation Clause challenge that appellant raises regarding the admission of testimony by a DNA analyst because any error was harmless. We affirm his convictions without further comment. However, we reverse and remand for resentencing consistent with the direction set out in Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989, 991 (Fla.2016).

WOLF, LEWIS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smallwood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 9, 2016
202 So. 3d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Smallwood v. State

Case Details

Full title:Cedric Tyrone SMALLWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Nov 9, 2016

Citations

202 So. 3d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)