From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smallwood v. Pope

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION
Oct 3, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-01517-TC (D. Or. Oct. 3, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:17-cv-01517-TC

10-03-2018

JOSEPH LOUIS SMALLWOOD, Plaintiff, v. M. POPE; K. HOGELAND; D. LILIENTHAL; DAVE G. POWELL, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER MCSHANE, Judge :

Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed a Findings and Recommendation ("F&R"), ECF No. 45, and the matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although the parties filed no objections, I have reviewed the legal principles de novo. See United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude that the report is correct. Judge Coffin's F&R is adopted in full. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, ECF No. 22, is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's equal protection claim and GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's due process claim. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, ECF No. 34, is GRANTED and Plaintiff allowed 30 days to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies of his due process and failure to protect claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 3rd day of October, 2018.

/s/ Michael McShane

Michael J. McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Smallwood v. Pope

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION
Oct 3, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-01517-TC (D. Or. Oct. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Smallwood v. Pope

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH LOUIS SMALLWOOD, Plaintiff, v. M. POPE; K. HOGELAND; D. LILIENTHAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 3, 2018

Citations

No. 2:17-cv-01517-TC (D. Or. Oct. 3, 2018)