Opinion
No. 135538.
May 2, 2008.
SC: 135538, COA: 275332, Van Buren CC: 05-054407-Nh
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 13, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.
Although I would deny leave to appeal with regard to the characterization by the Court of Appeals of plaintiff's two other claims, I believe that the court erred in characterizing as an ordinary-negligence claim plaintiff's claim that an x-ray should have been conducted following her appendectomy and before her incision was closed. Because this seems to me a matter significantly beyond common knowledge, Bryant v Oakpointe Villa Nursing Ctr, Inc, 471 Mich 411 (2004), I believe that this claim sounds in medical malpractice.
For the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion, I would reverse the Court of Appeals judgment in part and affirm the trial court's ruling that plaintiff's complaint sounded in medical malpractice rather than ordinary negligence.
CORRIGAN, J., joins the statement of YOUNG, J.