From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Small v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 7, 2009
Case No. 2:09-cv-712 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 7, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-712.

December 7, 2009


OPINION AND ORDER


On October 23, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts recommending that petitioner's "Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Federal Habeas Corpus" be denied. Petitioner has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Petitioner indicates that he is without legal training and innocent of the charges against him. See Doc. No. 5.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court has conducted a de novo review. As discussed in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, this Court is without the authority to grant an extension of time to file a federal habeas corpus petition. Petitioner must comply with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). Therefore, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.

Petitioner Small is ORDERED to file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus that complies with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 2244(d) within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Small v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 7, 2009
Case No. 2:09-cv-712 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 7, 2009)
Case details for

Small v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution

Case Details

Full title:Dean A. Small, Petitioner, v. Warden, Ross Correctional Institution…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Dec 7, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-712 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 7, 2009)