From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Small v. Springs Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Feb 5, 1990
388 S.E.2d 815 (S.C. 1990)

Opinion

23153

Submitted January 2, 1990.

Decided February 5, 1990.

Appeal from Charleston County; Louis E. Condon, Master-In-Equity.

Robin L. Hitchcock, of Brock Hitchcock, Charleston, for petitioner. Philip A. Middleton, Thomas J. Wills, IV and Robert A. Patterson, all of Barnwell, Whaley, Patterson Helms, Charleston, for respondent.


Submitted Jan. 2, 1990.

Decided Feb. 5, 1990.


Petitioner seeks certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Carolina Business Brokers v. Strickland, 299 S.C. 237, 384 S.E.2d 72 (Ct.App. 1989). Finding procedural errors, we grant certiorari, dispense with further briefing, reverse and remand with instructions.

The decision below rested on alternate grounds. Although there was no challenge by way of exception or argument in brief, the Court of Appeals reversed the master's finding that respondent withdrew the property from sale during the listing period. This was clearly error. See Connolly v. People's Life Ins. Co., 299 S.C. 348, 384 S.E.2d 738 (1989). Accordingly, the Court of Appeals' decision is reversed and the appeal remanded to that court with instructions to address only those issues which are properly before it.


Summaries of

Small v. Springs Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Feb 5, 1990
388 S.E.2d 815 (S.C. 1990)
Case details for

Small v. Springs Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CAROLINA BUSINESS BROKERS d/b/a Sunbelt Business Brokers, Petitioner v…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 5, 1990

Citations

388 S.E.2d 815 (S.C. 1990)
388 S.E.2d 815

Citing Cases

Bellamy v. Payne

The Supreme Court recently emphasized to this court that it can "address only those issues which are properly…