From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slover-Wittoesch v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 1, 2010
Case No. 1:05cv429 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 1, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 1:05cv429.

March 1, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on January 22, 2010 (Doc. 31).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees Under Social Security Action, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Doc. 30) is GRANTED. Counsel shall be awarded $17,000.00 in fees consistent with the opinion of the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Slover-Wittoesch v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 1, 2010
Case No. 1:05cv429 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Slover-Wittoesch v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Ann Slover-Wittoesch, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Mar 1, 2010

Citations

Case No. 1:05cv429 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 1, 2010)