From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slocum v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Nov 2, 2017
Case No. 17-C-557 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 2, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 17-C-557

11-02-2017

DADA R. SLOCUM, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT A. WILSON, MICHAEL A. MATTIOLI, DANIEL SMOKOVICH, REYNALDO ROMAN, BRADLEY NICKEL, SEAN PATYK, and CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Dada Slocum, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the defendants violated his constitutional rights. On October 18, 2017, Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin filed a Report and Recommendation screening Slocum's claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). ECF No. 8. The Magistrate Judge found that Slocum could proceed on certain claims against defendants Wilson and Mattioli and ordered service of these defendants.

The Magistrate Judge referred this case to this court on his recommendation that numerous claims be dismissed, including the failure to intervene claim against Smokovich, Roman, and Nickel; the Fifth Amendment claim against defendant Patyk; the Monell claim against the City of Milwaukee; and the due process claim against defendants Wilson, Mattioli, Smokovich, Roman, Nickel, and Patyk. He also recommended that Smokovich, Roman, Nickel, Patyk, and the City of Milwaukee be dismissed as defendants in this action.

The report and recommendation advised Slocum that he had 14 days from the date of the recommendation to file any objections. That deadline has passed, and Slocum has not submitted an objection. Because no objection was made, this court reviews the Magistrate Judge's report for clear error. Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). Upon review, the court finds no clear error in the report and recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Duffin's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Slocum's failure to intervene claim against Daniel Smokovich, Reynaldo Roman, and Bradley Nickel is DISMISSED.

IT IS ALSO ORDERED that Slocum's Fifth Amendment claim against Sean Patyk is DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Slocum's Monell claim against the City of Milwaukee is DISMISSED.

IT IS ALSO ORDERED that Slocum's due process claim against Scott Wilson, Michael Mattioli, Daniel Smokovich, Reynaldo Roman, Bradley Nickel, and Sean Patyk is DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Daniel Smokovich, Reynaldo Roman, Bradley Nickel, Sean Patyk, and the City of Milwaukee are DISMISSED as defendants in this action.

IT IS ALSO ORDERED that this case is REFERRED back to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin for further proceedings.

Dated this 2nd day of November, 2017.

s/ William C. Griesbach

William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Slocum v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Nov 2, 2017
Case No. 17-C-557 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 2, 2017)
Case details for

Slocum v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:DADA R. SLOCUM, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT A. WILSON, MICHAEL A. MATTIOLI, DANIEL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Date published: Nov 2, 2017

Citations

Case No. 17-C-557 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 2, 2017)