From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sliosberg v. New York Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1927
155 N.E. 913 (N.Y. 1927)

Opinion

Argued January 26, 1927

Decided March 1, 1927

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Charles E. Hughes and John Foster Dulles for appellant.

Albert Ottinger, Attorney-General ( Claude T. Dawes and Clarence C. Fowler of counsel), for Superintendent of Insurance.

John W. Davis and David E. Hudson for Equitable Life Assurance Society, amicus curiae. Walter H. Pollak, Ruth I. Wilson and Frederic C. Pitcher for respondent.

Louis Marshall, James Marshall and Borris M. Komen, amici curiae. Osmond K. Fraenkel and Charles Recht for Russian Policyholders, Inc., amici curiae. Frederick B. Campbell and Paul C. Whipp for First Russian Insurance Company et al., amici curiae. Samuel Greenbaum, Edward S. Greenbaum and Jonas J. Shapiro, amici curiae.



Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion in Sliosberg v. New York Life Insurance Company ( 244 N.Y. 482). First question certified answered in the affirmative; other questions not answered.

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, ANDREWS, LEHMAN, KELLOGG and O'BRIEN, JJ.


Summaries of

Sliosberg v. New York Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1927
155 N.E. 913 (N.Y. 1927)
Case details for

Sliosberg v. New York Life Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:HENRI M. SLIOSBERG, Respondent, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 1, 1927

Citations

155 N.E. 913 (N.Y. 1927)
155 N.E. 913

Citing Cases

Jones v. Allen

In rejecting a claim that the statute violates the separation of powers doctrine, the Court held that the…

Jones v. Allen

In rejecting a claim that the statute violates the separation of powers doctrine, the court held that the…