From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slingwine v. Gumienik

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 8, 1970
314 F. Supp. 748 (W.D. Pa. 1970)

Opinion

Civ. A. No. 15-70 Erie.

May 8, 1970.

Byron A. Baur, Erie, Pa., for defendant.

Leonard E. Price, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On March 26, 1970 Defendant filed "Motion for Summary Judgment and Judgment on the Pleadings." Counsel attached a certificate of service of a copy of the motion on plaintiff's counsel by mail the same date.

On April 20, 1970 the Court issued a Memorandum Order calling for Plaintiff to file his Response to said Motion and any supporting evidentiary materials and brief on or before May 1, 1970. Nothing has been received to this date.

On May 7, 1970, Defendant, the moving party, filed a brief.

We have before us the following facts established from the pleadings of defendant's evidentiary matters:

1. Plaintiff's Complaint was filed Feb. 17, 1970. Par. 4 of the Complaint avers that Plaintiff's decedent died Feb. 17, 1968. Therefore the Wrongful Death cause of action is barred by the Pennsylvania statute, 12 P.S. § 1603 which requires that such actions be brought within one year of death and not thereafter.

2. Plaintiff's Complaint shows that this is an action brought by a Pennsylvania administrator against an individual residing in New York state, arising out of an accident in Erie County, Pennsylvania. Jurisdiction is based on diversity and Pennsylvania law controls.

3. Plaintiff's counsel's affidavit and the attached report of the Coroner of Erie County, Pennsylvania, establish that the accident causing the injuries from which decedent died occurred on February 9, 1968. The law of Pennsylvania applies the statute of limitations to Survival Actions under the Act of 1937 as two years from the time of the accident causing the injuries. Stegner v. Fenton, 351 Pa. 292, 40 A.2d 473 (1945); Stafford v. Roadway Transit Co., 165 F.2d 920 (3rd Cir. 1948).

Therefore, the pleadings and evidentiary matters on file show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law under F.R. Civ.P. 56(c).

It is therefore ordered this 8th day of May, 1970 that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby dismissed. Judgment is entered for Defendant.


Summaries of

Slingwine v. Gumienik

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 8, 1970
314 F. Supp. 748 (W.D. Pa. 1970)
Case details for

Slingwine v. Gumienik

Case Details

Full title:Mark L. SLINGWINE, Administrator of the Estate of Gary Slingwine…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 8, 1970

Citations

314 F. Supp. 748 (W.D. Pa. 1970)

Citing Cases

Gumienik v. Lund

On February 17, 1970, Attorney Price filed a separate action at Civil Action No. 15-70 Erie on behalf of the…