From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slater v. Exeter-West Greenwich Regional School District

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island
Jul 16, 2007
CA 06-572 ML (D.R.I. Jul. 16, 2007)

Opinion

CA 06-572 ML.

July 16, 2007


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' objections to a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Almond on June 28, 2007. This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiffs' objections, and Defendant's response to Plaintiffs' objections.

This Court finds Plaintiffs' objections to be without merit. The Court further finds that the Magistrate Judge's factual determinations are well supported by the record and that his application of the law to those facts is consistent with applicable statutory and case law precedent. Plaintiffs' objections focus on incomplete excerpts from the testimony presented to the hearing officer. The hearing officer and Magistrate Judge based their findings on the entire record, including those excerpts now highlighted by Plaintiffs.

This Court, therefore, adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is denied, and judgment shall enter in favor of the Defendant.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Slater v. Exeter-West Greenwich Regional School District

United States District Court, D. Rhode Island
Jul 16, 2007
CA 06-572 ML (D.R.I. Jul. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Slater v. Exeter-West Greenwich Regional School District

Case Details

Full title:DENISE and ANDREW SLATER, as Parents of ROBERT SLATER v. EXETER-WEST…

Court:United States District Court, D. Rhode Island

Date published: Jul 16, 2007

Citations

CA 06-572 ML (D.R.I. Jul. 16, 2007)

Citing Cases

Linda E. v. Bristol Warren Regional School District

III. Standard of Review In reviewing an appeal from an administrative decision under IDEA, the Court accords…

Linda E. v. Bristol Warren Regional School District

III. Standard of Review In reviewing an appeal from an administrative decision under IDEA, the Court accords…