From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slamen v. Castenada

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 6, 2024
22-cv-02589-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2024)

Opinion

22-cv-02589-WHO (PR)

06-06-2024

MARK SLAMEN, Plaintiff, v. H. CASTENADA, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL DKT. NO. 27

WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation to voluntary dismissal with prejudice, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Dkt. No. 27.) As stated in the notice, each party shall bear its own fees and costs. (Id.)

The Clerk terminate all pending motions, enter judgment, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Slamen v. Castenada

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 6, 2024
22-cv-02589-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Slamen v. Castenada

Case Details

Full title:MARK SLAMEN, Plaintiff, v. H. CASTENADA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 6, 2024

Citations

22-cv-02589-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2024)