From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slade v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Aug 2, 2017
No. 4D17-957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 2, 2017)

Opinion

No. 4D17-957

08-02-2017

WILLIE SLADE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Willie Slade, Live Oak, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 312009CF001615B and 311992CF000115A. Willie Slade, Live Oak, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant's right to refile his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence with supporting record documentation attached on his claim of an oral versus written sentencing discrepancy. Zill v. State, 162 So. 3d 83 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). GERBER, C.J., CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Summaries of

Slade v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Aug 2, 2017
No. 4D17-957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 2, 2017)
Case details for

Slade v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE SLADE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 2, 2017

Citations

No. 4D17-957 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 2, 2017)