Because the allegations both repeat and supplement those made in prior actions and earlier in this action, this opinion should be read in conjunction with the Court's comprehensive opinion largely granting a prior motion for summary judgment. See Skoorka v. Kean Univ., No. 9-cv-3428, 2017 WL 2838459 (D.N.J. June 30, 2017).
Title VII discrimination, harassment, and retaliation updated to June 27, 2014. Motion to dismiss Skoorka v. Kean Univ., No. 09 CV 3428, 2017 WL 2838459 (D.N.J. June 30, 2017) (applying the law of the case doctrine, analyzing NYCHRL claims). REMAINING DEFENDANTS: Kean University Board of Trustees of Kean University.
See Skoorka v. Kean Univ. [Skoorka 2015], No. 09-3428, 2015 WL 3533878, at *24 (D.N.J. June 2, 2015). A fuller and more detailed account of the litigation in federal court up until June 2017 can be found in my prior opinion in Skoorka v. Kean Univ. [Skoorka 2017], No. 09-3428/14-4561, 2017 WL 2838459 (D.N.J. June 30, 2017). Specifically, I found that Dr. Skoorka "attempted to revive a litany of rejected claims" with this new complaint and that this complaint "lack[ed] for the most part evidence sufficient to create a genuine issue of fact that is material to a federal or state cause of action."