From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skogsberg Constr. Co. v. Hawthorne Indus. Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1983
94 A.D.2d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

May 23, 1983


In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Kelly, J.), dated October 27, 1982, which ordered the parties to commence a trial de novo, after they reached a valid settlement agreement in open court. Order reversed, on the law, with costs, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings consistent herewith. On February 19, 1976, the parties entered into a stipulation of settlement, on the record in open court. Plaintiffs failed to comply with the terms of the settlement, and defendant moved for enforcement thereof. Such procedure was proper (see Teitlebaum Holdings v Gold, 48 N.Y.2d 51). "Where the parties enter into a stipulation recorded in the minutes of the court, the settlement agreement terminates all of the claims of the parties heretofore made in the action, and the agreement becomes enforceable as a contract binding on all the parties thereto ( Langlois v Langlois, 5 A.D.2d 75, 78)" ( Biener v Hystron Fibers, 78 A.D.2d 162, 167). Consequently, Trial Term abused its discretion in ordering "a trial de novo". Defendant is entitled to a hearing at which the sole issue will be the damages it sustained as the result of plaintiffs' breach of the stipulation of settlement. We have considered plaintiffs' contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P.J., Titone, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Skogsberg Constr. Co. v. Hawthorne Indus. Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1983
94 A.D.2d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Skogsberg Constr. Co. v. Hawthorne Indus. Park

Case Details

Full title:SKOGSBERG CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., et al., Respondents, v. HAWTHORNE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 23, 1983

Citations

94 A.D.2d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

TLH Constr. Corp. v. Arkay Constr., Inc.

DISCUSSIONColonial argues that restoration of the case is improper because the Settlement reached at the…

State v. Warren Brothers Co., Inc.

By an order dated October 12, 1990, the court, upon renewal and reargument, adhered to the original…