From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skipper v. Jumpstart

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division
Feb 15, 2022
Civil Action 4:20-4146-TLW-TER (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:20-4146-TLW-TER

02-15-2022

RONALD DE'RAY SKIPPER, PLAINTIFF, v. JUMPSTART; DAVE JOHNSON, INSIDER COORDINATOR; AND CARY SANDERS, INSIDE DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS.


ORDER

Thomas E. Rogers, III United States Magistrate Judge

This matter was previously before the court on Plaintiff's motion for issuance of a subpoena filed January 3, 2022. (ECF No. 74). An order was entered on this motion on January 5, 2022, granting and denying the motion. Specifically, Plaintiff requested two subpoena forms for the SCDC and was instructed to provide the court with the specific information he sought to subpoena and the correct names and addresses of the witnesses he sought to request certain information from via subpoena duces tetum. The Clerk of Court was directed to attach two blank subpoena duces tecum forms to the order, and Plaintiff was given fourteen (14) days from the date of the order to complete the blank subpoena forms for review by the court with the additional information as outlined above.

As stated, Plaintiff had requested two subpoena duces tecum forms to subpoena documents from the non-party South Carolina Department of Corrections. Plaintiff returned the subpoena forms to the court for review. One of the completed Subpoena forms is directed to Thomas M. Osmir, the Administrator for the Department of Rehabilitative Programs Division at Perry Correctional Institution for the SCDC requesting “written policies, procedures, correspondence, memorandums, agreements, orders, security classification and training for Jumpstart volunteers/employees and directives for the volunteers/employees approved by Perry Correctional Institution.” The clerk of court is directed to sign and issue this subpoena to the Plaintiff for Plaintiff to properly serve the subpoena duces tecum pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The second subpoena form Plaintiff completed and submitted for the court's review is not directed to the SCDC as Plaintiff had indicated in the motion of January 3, 2022, but directed to Tommy Moore, Executive Director for Jumpstart, Inc. Jumpstart, Inc. is a party in this action and Plaintiff should seek the documents pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 34.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Skipper v. Jumpstart

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division
Feb 15, 2022
Civil Action 4:20-4146-TLW-TER (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Skipper v. Jumpstart

Case Details

Full title:RONALD DE'RAY SKIPPER, PLAINTIFF, v. JUMPSTART; DAVE JOHNSON, INSIDER…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division

Date published: Feb 15, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 4:20-4146-TLW-TER (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 2022)