From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skibo v. Bolt

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Nov 9, 2021
File 21-cv-1906 (ECT/DTS) (D. Minn. Nov. 9, 2021)

Opinion

File 21-cv-1906 (ECT/DTS)

11-09-2021

Scott Skibo and David Eugene Rickets, Plaintiffs, v. S. Bolt, Captain Wadis, and Warden Kallis, Defendants.


ORDER

Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz issued a Report and Recommendation on September 27, 2021. ECF No. 4. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ACCEPTED.
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
3. The Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Skibo v. Bolt

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Nov 9, 2021
File 21-cv-1906 (ECT/DTS) (D. Minn. Nov. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Skibo v. Bolt

Case Details

Full title:Scott Skibo and David Eugene Rickets, Plaintiffs, v. S. Bolt, Captain…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Nov 9, 2021

Citations

File 21-cv-1906 (ECT/DTS) (D. Minn. Nov. 9, 2021)