From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skibbe v. Michigan Department of Corrections

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 9, 2006
Case No. 1:05-cv-175 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2006)

Summary

holding that because individual officials are not public entities or programs, they are not liable in their personal capacities under either the ADA or RA

Summary of this case from Harrison v. Mackie

Opinion

Case No. 1:05-cv-175.

March 9, 2006


OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. The Court has received objections from the plaintiff. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has performed de novo consideration of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection has been made.

It is undisputed that plaintiff is a disabled prisoner who is being accommodated while housed at the Standish Correctional Facility (SMF). Plaintiff sues defendants because they failed to provide handicap access to housing in the protection unit at Kinross Correctional Facility (KCF). In his objections, plaintiff states that he has never asserted that he has a right to be transferred to KCF or that the failure to transfer him violates his rights. Further, plaintiff claims that he has never demanded a transfer to KCF, has never asked the court to transfer him to KCF, and has never argued that he should be transferred to KCF. Plaintiff maintains that as a result, his complaint cannot be dismissed.

It is clear that plaintiff's rights are not violated by the lack of handicap facilities at KCF. Plaintiff is not housed at KCF and most likely will never be housed at KCF. Plaintiff's needs are being fully accommodated at SMF. Defendants have not violated any of plaintiff's rights.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Skibbe v. Michigan Department of Corrections

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 9, 2006
Case No. 1:05-cv-175 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2006)

holding that because individual officials are not public entities or programs, they are not liable in their personal capacities under either the ADA or RA

Summary of this case from Harrison v. Mackie

holding that because individual officials are not public entities or programs, they are not liable in their personal capacities under either the ADA or RA

Summary of this case from Barhite v. Trierweiler
Case details for

Skibbe v. Michigan Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:MARK RICHARD SKIBBE, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 9, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:05-cv-175 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2006)

Citing Cases

Kaufman v. Wolfenbarger

Because Wolfenbarger does not qualify as a "program or activity" that receives Federal financial assistance,…

Harrison v. Mackie

However, neither Title II of the ADA nor the RA provides for suit against a public official acting in his or…