From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skerry v. Lamb

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 25, 1967
432 P.2d 792 (Or. 1967)

Opinion

Argued October 6, Affirmed October 25, 1967

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County.

CHARLES S. WOODRICH, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

James F. Spiekerman, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Mautz, Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey Williamson.

Frank A. Bauman, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Keane, Haessler, Bauman and Harper, Portland, and Stanley C. Jones, Jr., and Joel B. Reeder, Medford.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and McALLISTER, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.


On July 9, 1964, Zelma Lamb and Drew Lamb gave a note and mortgage for $60,000 to a trustee for the benefit of their son. Five days later the makers of the note suffered a not unexpected judgment in the sum of $1,740,000. In this proceeding by the trustee to foreclose the mortgage, the trial court held the note and mortgage to be void because in fraud of creditors. The trustee appeals.

The issues were primarily factual and the evidence tended to prove that the defendants Lamb executed the note and mortgage in an effort to put the property beyond the reach of their creditors.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Skerry v. Lamb

Oregon Supreme Court
Oct 25, 1967
432 P.2d 792 (Or. 1967)
Case details for

Skerry v. Lamb

Case Details

Full title:SKERRY, Appellant, v. LAMB ET AL, Defendants, LITHIA LUMBER COMPANY…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Oct 25, 1967

Citations

432 P.2d 792 (Or. 1967)
432 P.2d 792

Citing Cases

Lithia Lumber Co. v. Lamb

This is another stage in litigation that has been proceeding for several years between Lithia Lumber Company,…