From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skedel v. Consol. Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 19, 1976
51 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

January 19, 1976


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant Louis Waldman, Jr., Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 4, 1975, as, upon granting its motion to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution, did so conditionally. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted unconditionally. The motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 should have been granted unconditionally (McKay v Smithtown Gen. Hosp., 42 A.D.2d 594; Chodikoff v Troy Estates, 37 A.D.2d 670). Gulotta, P.J., Rabin, Hopkins, Latham and Margett, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Skedel v. Consol. Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 19, 1976
51 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Skedel v. Consol. Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROSE P. SKEDEL et al., Respondents, v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 19, 1976

Citations

51 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)