From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skaggs v. Gordon Food Serv. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION
Apr 21, 2016
4:15-cv-00118-RLY-DML (S.D. Ind. Apr. 21, 2016)

Opinion

4:15-cv-00118-RLY-DML

04-21-2016

BRITTANIE SKAGGS, Plaintiff, v. GORDON FOOD SERVICE INC., d/b/a GORDON FOOD SERVICE; GORDON FOOD SERVICE LLC, d/b/a GORDON FOOD SERVICE, Defendants.


ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS and MOTION FOR SUMMARY RULING

Defendants, Gordon Food Service, Inc. and Gordon Food Service, LLC, moved to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to: prosecute the case, abide by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and comply with court orders. When Plaintiff, Brittanie Skaggs, failed to respond, Defendants moved for a summary ruling pursuant to the court's local rules. See S.D. Ind. L.R. 7-1(c)(4) ("The court may summarily rule on a motion if an opposing party does not file a response within the deadline.").

As the Seventh Circuit has made clear, "[W]hen presented with a motion to dismiss, the nonmoving party must proffer some legal basis to support h[er] cause of action. The federal courts will not invent legal arguments for litigants." Stransky v. Cummins Engine Co., 51 F.3d 1329, 1335 (7th Cir. 1995) (citation omitted). Put another way, "Our system of justice is adversarial, and our judges are busy people. If they are given plausible reasons for dismissing a complaint, they are not going to do the plaintiff's research and try to discover whether there might be something to say against the defendants' reasoning." Kirksey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 168 F.3d 1039, 1041 (7th Cir. 1999) (quoted in G&S Holdings LLC v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 697 F.3d 534, 538 (7th Cir. 2012)). Because Plaintiff failed to muster any opposition to either the motion to dismiss or the motion for summary ruling, her Complaint shall be dismissed forthwith. Therefore, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 19) and Motion for Summary Ruling (Filing No. 23) are both GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED this 21st day of April 2016.

/s/_________

RICHARD L. YOUNG, CHIEF JUDGE

United States District Court

Southern District of Indiana Distributed Electronically to Registered Counsel of Record.


Summaries of

Skaggs v. Gordon Food Serv. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION
Apr 21, 2016
4:15-cv-00118-RLY-DML (S.D. Ind. Apr. 21, 2016)
Case details for

Skaggs v. Gordon Food Serv. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BRITTANIE SKAGGS, Plaintiff, v. GORDON FOOD SERVICE INC., d/b/a GORDON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION

Date published: Apr 21, 2016

Citations

4:15-cv-00118-RLY-DML (S.D. Ind. Apr. 21, 2016)