SITO Mobile R&D IP, LLC v. Hulu LLC

Full title: SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC, SITO MOBILE, LTD., Appellants v. HULU, LLC,

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 5, 2024

No. 2022-1989 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2024)

Opinion

2022-1990 2022-1991

04-05-2024

SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC, SITO MOBILE, LTD., Appellants v. HULU, LLC,

STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER, Carmichael Ip, Tysons, VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES CARMICHAEL, MINGHUI YANG; JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, RICHARD JUANG, KEVIN SPRENGER, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA. BRETT JOHNSTON WILLIAMSON, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRADLEY M. BERG, CAMERON WILLIAM WESTIN; NATHANIEL LEGUM, Los Angeles, CA; AMY LIANG, San Francisco, CA.

PER CURIAM

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-00298, IPR2021-00304.

STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER, Carmichael Ip, Tysons, VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES CARMICHAEL, MINGHUI YANG; JASON SCOTT CHARKOW, RONALD M. DAIGNAULT, CHANDRAN IYER, RICHARD JUANG, KEVIN SPRENGER, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA.

BRETT JOHNSTON WILLIAMSON, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRADLEY M. BERG, CAMERON WILLIAM WESTIN;

NATHANIEL LEGUM, Los Angeles, CA; AMY LIANG, San Francisco, CA.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

DYK, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.