From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sisney v. Reisch

United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division
Feb 4, 2007
CIV 03-4260 (D.S.D. Feb. 4, 2007)

Opinion

CIV 03-4260.

February 4, 2007


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Defendants' reply brief on their summary judgment motion is due on February 28, 2007. The issue in the summary judgment motion is whether Plaintiff's action should be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Supreme Court issued a decision on January 22, 2007, regarding exhaustion of administrative remedies under a section of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), see Jones v. Bock, Nos. 05-7058, 05-7142, 2007 WL 135890 (U.S. Jan. 22, 2007), which significantly impacts Defendants' arguments in this action. Thus, the Court will direct Defendants to address the impact of this decision in their reply brief due February 28, 2007, and will allow Plaintiff an opportunity to respond to Defendants' arguments about how Jones v. Bock, supra, affects the exhaustion issue before the Court. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. That, in their reply brief due February 28, 2007, Defendants shall address the impact of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Jones v. Bock, Nos. 05-7058, 05-7142, 2007 WL 135890 (U.S. Jan. 22, 2007), on their Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies, Doc. 154.
2. That, on or before March 9, 2007, Plaintiff may file a brief in response to Defendants' arguments in their reply brief regarding the impact of Jones v. Bock, supra, on the exhaustion issues in this action.


Summaries of

Sisney v. Reisch

United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division
Feb 4, 2007
CIV 03-4260 (D.S.D. Feb. 4, 2007)
Case details for

Sisney v. Reisch

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. SISNEY, Plaintiff, v. TIM REISCH, Secretary of Corrections for…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 4, 2007

Citations

CIV 03-4260 (D.S.D. Feb. 4, 2007)