From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sisk v. Gannet Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jul 2, 2012
NO. 3-11-1159 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 2, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3-11-1159

07-02-2012

EILEEN SISK v. GANNET COMPANY, INC., et al.


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Co.'s Motion for Partial Dismissal (Docket No. 26), joined in by Defendants Gannett Company, Inc. and Gannett Company Inc. Income Protection Plan (Docket No. 28). Defendants seek dismissal of Plaintiff's breach of fiduciary duty claim.

Plaintiff has filed a Response to the Motion (Docket No. 33), in which she indicates no objection to the dismissal of the separate breach of fiduciary duty claim in paragraph 29 of her Amended Complaint (Docket No. 23).

Accordingly, Defendants' Motions (Docket Nos. 26 and 28) are GRANTED as unopposed, and Plaintiff's breach of fiduciary claim is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sisk v. Gannet Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jul 2, 2012
NO. 3-11-1159 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Sisk v. Gannet Co.

Case Details

Full title:EILEEN SISK v. GANNET COMPANY, INC., et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jul 2, 2012

Citations

NO. 3-11-1159 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 2, 2012)