From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siplen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 30, 2007
969 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Summary

holding that the trial court erred in modifying the defendant's probationary sentence because the modification order was not entered within sixty days after sentencing

Summary of this case from Colvin v. State

Opinion

No. 5D07-1843.

November 30, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Lisa Davidson, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and David S. Morgan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Appellant challenges the modification of his probationary sentence, which occurred fourteen months after the probationary sentence was imposed. The court modified Appellant's probation to include electronic monitoring, a mandatory condition of probation. Because the modification did not occur within sixty days after Appellant's sentencing, the modification was erroneous. Fields v. State, 968 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); Kiriazes v. State, 798 So.2d 789 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Accordingly, we reverse with the direction that the added condition of probation be stricken.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMPSON, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Siplen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 30, 2007
969 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

holding that the trial court erred in modifying the defendant's probationary sentence because the modification order was not entered within sixty days after sentencing

Summary of this case from Colvin v. State
Case details for

Siplen v. State

Case Details

Full title:Freddie James SIPLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 30, 2007

Citations

969 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Grosso v. State

See Harrott, 960 So.2d at 798 ("Where the defendant's sentence is incomplete because it omits a mandatory…

Colvin v. State

The instant modification order, which was entered more than seven years after the defendant's sentence was…