From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sipe v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 10, 2015
Case No. 1:14-cv-02016-LJO-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 1:14-cv-02016-LJO-MJS (PC)

02-10-2015

HOWARD SIPE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AUDREY KING, et al., Defendants.


ORDER SEVERING CLAIMS OF STEPHEN WILSON, AND DIRECTING CLERK'S OFFICE TO OPEN NEW ACTION FOR STEPHEN WILSON

(ECF No. 1)

Plaintiffs Howard Sipe and Stephen Wilson are civil detainees proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The complaint purports to proceed on behalf of both Sipe and Wilson and is signed by both.

I. SEVERANCE OF CLAIMS

Plaintiffs' allegations do not provide a basis for a class action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(4); Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc., 546 F.3d 661, 664-65 (9th Cir. 2008).

Courts have broad discretion regarding the permissive joinder of parties. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20, 21; see Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271, 1296-97 (9th Cir. 2000); Maddox v. County of Sacramento, No. 2:06-cv-0072-GEB-EFB, 2006 WL 3201078, *2 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2006). The need for co-plaintiffs to agree upon and sign all filings becomes impossibly burdensome where, as here, the proposed co-plaintiffs are civilly detained.

Accordingly, Plaintiffs Sipe and Wilson shall each proceed separately on their claims. Wilson's claims shall be severed, and a new action shall be opened for his claims. Gaffney v. Riverboat Serv. of Indiana, 451 F.3d 424, 441 (7th Cir. 2006). Sipe shall proceed as the sole Plaintiff in this action. Each plaintiff shall be solely responsible for prosecuting his own action.

II. ORDER

Accordingly, based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff Sipe shall proceed as the sole plaintiff in case number 1:14-cv-02016-LJO-MJS (PC);



2. The claims of Stephen Wilson are severed from the claims of Plaintiff Sipe;



3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to:



a. Open a separate § 1983 civil rights action for Stephen Wilson, CO-408-5, Coalinga State Hospital (5003), PO Box 5003, Coalinga, CA 93210-5003;



b. Assign the new action to the Magistrate Judge and District Judge to whom the instant case is assigned and make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for such assignment;



c. File and docket a copy of this Order in the new action opened for Stephen Wilson;



d. Place a copy of the complaint (ECF No. 1), Exhibits (ECF No. 2), and Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 8) in the new
action opened for Stephen Wilson;



e. Send Stephen Wilson a copy of this order, bearing the case number assigned to his own individual action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2015

/s/ Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Sipe v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 10, 2015
Case No. 1:14-cv-02016-LJO-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Sipe v. King

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD SIPE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AUDREY KING, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 10, 2015

Citations

Case No. 1:14-cv-02016-LJO-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2015)