From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singleton v. Wayne

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 11, 2011
CV 06-04531 AHM (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2011)

Opinion

CV 06-04531 AHM (FFM)

08-11-2011

KELVIN X. SINGLETON, Plaintiff, v. R. WAYNE et al., Defendants.

Kamala D. Harris Attorney General of California Rene L. Lucaric Supervising Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendant R. Wayne Kelvin X. Singleton, Plaintiff


ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL


Judge: The Honorable Frederick F. Mumm

Action Filed: 10/31/2006

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), Plaintiff Kelvin X. Singleton (Plaintiff), and Defendant R. Wayne (Defendant) hereby stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action, with prejudice.

Each party is to bear his or her own costs, fees, and expenses of any type relating to these cases.

There is no prevailing party in this action.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Kamala D. Harris

Attorney General of California

Rene L. Lucaric

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendant R. Wayne

Kelvin X. Singleton, Plaintiff

ORDER

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(ii), and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party to bear his own costs, fees, and expenses of any type, including attorney's fees. There is no prevailing party in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Honorable A. Howard Matz


Summaries of

Singleton v. Wayne

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 11, 2011
CV 06-04531 AHM (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Singleton v. Wayne

Case Details

Full title:KELVIN X. SINGLETON, Plaintiff, v. R. WAYNE et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 11, 2011

Citations

CV 06-04531 AHM (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2011)