From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singleton v. Rivera

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 26, 2012
489 F. App'x 727 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-7085

11-26-2012

NATHANIEL SINGLETON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN RIVERA; ASSOCIATE WARDEN WEIR; ASSIST WITTMAN; DR. PHILLIPES; COMMANDER GLENN; COMMANDER BRADY; MR. AGRLINE; D. COUICK; OFFICER MS. VENTON; OFFICER MS. JOHNSON, Defendants - Appellees.

Nathaniel Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01909-RBH) Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Singleton appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Singleton v. Warden Rivera, No. 1:10-cv-01909-RBH (D.S.C. June 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Singleton v. Rivera

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 26, 2012
489 F. App'x 727 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Singleton v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL SINGLETON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN RIVERA; ASSOCIATE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 26, 2012

Citations

489 F. App'x 727 (4th Cir. 2012)