From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singleton v. Baugham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 28, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-2633 DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2018)

Opinion

2:18-cv-2633 DB P

11-28-2018

DEVON SINGLETON, Plaintiff, v. D. BAUGHAM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DEBORAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By order issued October 19, 2018, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. (ECF No. 8). Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a District Court judge to this action.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Singleton v. Baugham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 28, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-2633 DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Singleton v. Baugham

Case Details

Full title:DEVON SINGLETON, Plaintiff, v. D. BAUGHAM, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 28, 2018

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-2633 DB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2018)