From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Sacramento Cnty.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 28, 2023
2:23-CV-0055-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-CV-0056-DMC-P

04-28-2023

RAGHVENDRA SINGH, also known as Raj Singh, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. Plaintiff's complaint, and service thereof by the United States Marshal if appropriate, will be addressed separately. The Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons unless specifically directed by the court to do so.

Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) showing that Plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security therefor.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, is granted.


Summaries of

Singh v. Sacramento Cnty.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 28, 2023
2:23-CV-0055-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Singh v. Sacramento Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:RAGHVENDRA SINGH, also known as Raj Singh, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 28, 2023

Citations

2:23-CV-0055-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2023)