From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Kane

United States District Court, D. Arizona
May 10, 2011
No. CV-11-00062-PHX-NVW (JRI) (D. Ariz. May. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV-11-00062-PHX-NVW (JRI).

May 10, 2011


ORDER


Before the court is Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1). On April 21, 2011, United States Magistrate Jay R. Irwin issued a Report and Recommendation ("R R") (Doc. 14) in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The R R recommended that the petition be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. No objections were filed.

The court has reviewed the R R and agrees with the magistrate judge's determinations. Accordingly, the court will accept the R R and dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge").

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED accepting the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Irwin (Doc. #14).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Clerk of the Court enter judgment dismissing Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk shall terminate this action.


Summaries of

Singh v. Kane

United States District Court, D. Arizona
May 10, 2011
No. CV-11-00062-PHX-NVW (JRI) (D. Ariz. May. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Singh v. Kane

Case Details

Full title:Sukhwinder Singh, Petitioner, v. Katrina S. Kane, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: May 10, 2011

Citations

No. CV-11-00062-PHX-NVW (JRI) (D. Ariz. May. 10, 2011)