From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Jaddou

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 1, 2023
2:23-cv-00297-JAM-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00297-JAM-AC

09-01-2023

KULDEEP SINGH, Plaintiff, v. UR M. JADDOU, DIRECTOR, USCIS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On July 17, 2023 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations as of August 16, 2023.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 17, 2023, are ADOPTED in full; and
2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Local Rule 110.


Summaries of

Singh v. Jaddou

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 1, 2023
2:23-cv-00297-JAM-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Singh v. Jaddou

Case Details

Full title:KULDEEP SINGH, Plaintiff, v. UR M. JADDOU, DIRECTOR, USCIS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 1, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00297-JAM-AC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2023)