From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 17, 2012
No. 08-70514 (9th Cir. Feb. 17, 2012)

Opinion

No. 08-70514 Agency No. A079-375-080

02-17-2012

SURINDER SINGH, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals


Submitted February 15, 2012

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
--------

San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

In prior pleadings, Singh's attorney filed a motion to withdraw as Counsel of Record. In his motion, counsel stated that Singh had departed the United States approximately six months previously and had failed to cooperate with counsel's efforts to prosecute this case. We granted the motion to withdraw, deferred submission of the case, and issued Singh an order to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Singh responded by letter that he had left the United States and no longer wished to prosecute his petition for review. Given the response, we resubmitted the case and now dismiss the petition for review for failure to prosecute.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Singh v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 17, 2012
No. 08-70514 (9th Cir. Feb. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Singh v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:SURINDER SINGH, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 17, 2012

Citations

No. 08-70514 (9th Cir. Feb. 17, 2012)