From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. ELK Grove Police Dept.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 24, 2023
2:23-cv-0647 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-0647 CKD P

04-24-2023

GURPREET SINGH, Plaintiff, v. ELK GROVE POLICE DEPT. et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a Sacramento County prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the required filing fee of $350.00 plus the $52.00 administrative fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

If leave to file in forma pauperis is granted, plaintiff will still be required to pay the filing fee but will be allowed to pay it in installments. Litigants proceeding in forma pauperis are not required to pay the $52.00 administrative fee.

1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the required fees in the amount of $402.00; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.


Summaries of

Singh v. ELK Grove Police Dept.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 24, 2023
2:23-cv-0647 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Singh v. ELK Grove Police Dept.

Case Details

Full title:GURPREET SINGH, Plaintiff, v. ELK GROVE POLICE DEPT. et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 24, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-0647 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2023)