From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Thomas

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 22, 2014
113 A.D.3d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-01-22

Karnail SINGH, appellant, v. Duane Park THOMAS, Jr., et al., respondents.

Subin Associates, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Gregory T. Cerchione and Robert J. Eisen of counsel), for appellant. Michael E. Pressman, New York, N.Y. (Thomas G. Connolly and Stuart B. Cholewa of counsel), for respondents.


Subin Associates, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Gregory T. Cerchione and Robert J. Eisen of counsel), for appellant. Michael E. Pressman, New York, N.Y. (Thomas G. Connolly and Stuart B. Cholewa of counsel), for respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Elliot, J.), entered May 9, 2013, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff's vehicle was involved in an accident at the intersection of Queens Boulevard and Skillman Avenue in Queens, when it came into contact with a tractor-trailer owned by the defendant Laubscher Cheese Co., Inc., and operated by the defendant Duane Park Thomas, Jr. The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants to recover damages for personal injuries.

The plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. In support of his motion, he submitted his own affidavit, in which he stated that the accident occurred as he was traveling in the right lane of Queens Boulevard. He averred that the tractor-trailer, operated by Thomas, which had been traveling in the lane to his left, suddenly turned right into the plaintiff's lane of travel without warning or signaling and without sufficient time for the plaintiff to avoid the collision. The Supreme Court denied the plaintiff's motion.

The plaintiff established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability through his affidavit, which demonstrated that Thomas was negligent because he violated Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1128(a) and 1163, and that the plaintiff was free from comparative fault ( see Qi Sheng Lu v. World Wide Travel of Greater N.Y., Ltd., 111 A.D.3d 690, 974 N.Y.S.2d 547; Matos v. Salem Truck Leasing, 105 A.D.3d 916, 963 N.Y.S.2d 366; Meng Wai Wang v. Dailly News, L.P., 90 A.D.3d 624, 933 N.Y.S.2d 888; Vainer v. DiSalvo, 79 A.D.3d 1023, 914 N.Y.S.2d 236).

In opposition, however, the defendants raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff was trying to pass the tractor-trailer on the right side, and whether he contributed to the happening of the accident ( seeVehicle and Traffic Law § 1123[b]; Matos v. Salem Truck Leasing, 105 A.D.3d at 917, 963 N.Y.S.2d 366; Francis v. J.R. Bros. Corp., 98 A.D.3d 940, 950 N.Y.S.2d 584; Karash v. Adetunji, 56 A.D.3d 726, 868 N.Y.S.2d 128).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. SKELOS, J.P., LOTT, COHEN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Singh v. Thomas

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 22, 2014
113 A.D.3d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Singh v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:Karnail SINGH, appellant, v. Duane Park THOMAS, Jr., et al., respondents.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 22, 2014

Citations

113 A.D.3d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
113 A.D.3d 748
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 338

Citing Cases

Qureshi v. Brinks, Inc.

The plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability, and the Supreme Court denied the…

Gluck v. N.Y. City Hous. Auth.

The plaintiff alleges that the defendants violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1128(a), which states that “[a]…