From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Chinn

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 8, 2015
EDCV 14-1228-MWF(ASx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2015)

Opinion

          For Frank Singh, Plaintiff: Daniel Joseph Malakauskas, The Malakauskas Law Firm, Stockton, CA.


          PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

          HONORABLE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than May 8, 2015, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

         The Court will consider the filing of the following on or before the above date as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause: Proof of service of summons and complaint.

         No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action .

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Singh v. Chinn

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 8, 2015
EDCV 14-1228-MWF(ASx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Singh v. Chinn

Case Details

Full title:Frank Singh v. Peter Chinn, et al

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 8, 2015

Citations

EDCV 14-1228-MWF(ASx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2015)