From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Barr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 10, 2020
No. 19-70543 (9th Cir. Aug. 10, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-70543

08-10-2020

BHINDER JIT SINGH, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Agency No. A096-161-410 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Bhinder Jit Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Martinez-Hernandez v. Holder, 778 F.3d 1086, 1088 (9th Cir. 2015). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh's untimely motion to reopen for failure to demonstrate he acted with the due diligence required for equitable tolling. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i); Avagyan v. Holder, 646 F.3d 672, 679 (9th Cir. 2011) (due diligence requires that petitioner took reasonable steps to investigate prior counsel's suspected error, or, if petitioner was ignorant of counsel's shortcomings, made reasonable efforts to pursue relief).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Singh v. Barr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 10, 2020
No. 19-70543 (9th Cir. Aug. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Singh v. Barr

Case Details

Full title:BHINDER JIT SINGH, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 10, 2020

Citations

No. 19-70543 (9th Cir. Aug. 10, 2020)