From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simpson v. Simpson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 25, 1996
924 S.W.2d 321 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 69234.

June 25, 1996.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; HON. THOMAS J. FRAWLEY.

Frank J. Niesen, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.

Richard Boardman, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.


ORDER


Mother appeals from the trial court's order modifying the decree of dissolution. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16 (b).


Summaries of

Simpson v. Simpson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 25, 1996
924 S.W.2d 321 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Simpson v. Simpson

Case Details

Full title:RONALD SIMPSON, PETITIONER/RESPONDENT, v. PAMELA SIMPSON N/K/A PAMELA…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jun 25, 1996

Citations

924 S.W.2d 321 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)