From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simon v. Usher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 4, 2010
73 A.D.3d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2700.

May 4, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Maryann Brigantti-Hughes, J.), entered October 27, 2009, which, in a medical malpractice action, granted the motion of defendants Usher, Chait, Hartsdale Medical Group, EC. and White Flains Hospital Center to change venue from Bronx County to Westchester County, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

Gair, Gair, Conason, Steigman, Mackauf, Bloom Rubinowitz, New York (Rhonda E. Kay of counsel), for appellants.

Kopff, Nardelli Dopf LLP, New York (Martin B. Adams of counsel), for Sol M. Usher, Sol M. Usher, M.D., P.C., F.A.C.S., Maxwell M. Chait, Hartsdale Medical Group, P.C., and White Plains Hospital Center, respondents.

Rende, Ryan Downes, LLP, White Plains (Roland T. Koke of counsel), for Sheldon Alter, Mid-Westchester Medical Associates, LLP, The Westchester Medical Group, P.C. and Marianne Monahan, respondents.

Before: Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Renwick, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.


Although the moving defendants-made a timely demand for a change of venue, their motion for such relief was untimely. A defendant "may move to change the place of trial within fifteen days after service of the demand," unless the plaintiff consents to the change of venue within five days of service of the demand (CPLR 511 [b]). Here, the motion for a change of venue, made 20 days after service of the demand, must be rejected as untimely ( see Singh v Becher, 249 AD2d 154). Contrary to moving defendants' claim, they were not entitled to the fiveday extension in CPLR 2103 (b) (2) for time periods measured from service by mail ( see Thompson v Cuadrado, 277 AD2d 151). Furthermore, the failure of the remaining defendants to serve a demand to change venue with or prior to their answer was fatal to their request to change venue ( see Kurfis v Shore Towers Condominium, 48 AD3d 300; CPLR 511 [a]).


Summaries of

Simon v. Usher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 4, 2010
73 A.D.3d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Simon v. Usher

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN SIMON et al., Appellants, v. SOL M. USHER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 4, 2010

Citations

73 A.D.3d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 3777
899 N.Y.S.2d 601

Citing Cases

Moracho v. Open Door Fam

Normally, the failure to comply with either the demand requirement or the 15-day time limit of CPLR 511…