From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simon v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Aug 8, 2013
No. 04-13-00292-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 04-13-00292-CR

08-08-2013

Armando SIMON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR2132

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding


ORDER

Appellant has filed a pro se motion asking this court to appoint counsel for him. Appellant currently has appointed counsel, but asserts appointed counsel has advised appellant that he intends to file an Anders brief in this matter, asserting there is no arguable basis for an appeal. Appellant is not entitled to new appointed counsel at this time. Rather, once an Anders brief is filed, this court will issue an order advising appellant that he may file a pro se brief on his own behalf, pointing out those errors he believes have a basis in law and fact. This court will then review the pro se brief, if one is filed, and the record to determine if there are any arguable grounds for appeal. See Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). If there are, we will remand the matter back to the trial court for appointment of new counsel. Id. Accordingly, we DENY appellant's motion to appoint counsel.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of August, 2013.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Simon v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Aug 8, 2013
No. 04-13-00292-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Simon v. State

Case Details

Full title:Armando SIMON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Aug 8, 2013

Citations

No. 04-13-00292-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 8, 2013)