From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simms v. Hathaway

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 14, 2023
No. C23-05068-MJP-SKV (W.D. Wash. Feb. 14, 2023)

Opinion

C23-05068-MJP-SKV

02-14-2023

DANIEL JERIMIAH SIMMS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL HATHAWAY et al., Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable S. Kate Vaughan, United States Magistrate Judge:

On February 10, 2023, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff that appeared to contain a request for preliminary injunctive relief to prevent his transfer to Airway Heights Corrections Center. See Dkt. 7.

To obtain preliminary injunctive relief, Plaintiff must demonstrate: (1) a likelihood of success on the merits; (2) a likelihood of suffering irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) that the balance of equities tips in his favor; and (4) that an injunction is in the public interest. Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). Alternatively, under the “sliding scale” version of this test, a preliminary injunction may be appropriate where there are serious questions going to the merits and the balance of hardships tips sharply in the moving party's favor, and where the irreparable harm and public interest factors are satisfied. All. for the Wild Rockies v. Pena, 865 F.3d 1211, 1217 (9th Cir. 2017) (citations omitted).

The purpose of a preliminary injunction is to preserve the positions of the parties until a trial on the merits can be held. Univ. of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 395 (1981). It is an extraordinary and drastic remedy that is never awarded as of right. Munaf v. Geren, 553 U.S. 674, 689-90 (1997). Furthermore, a preliminary injunction is only intended to grant intermediate relief of the same character that would be granted if the party seeking the injunction succeeded on the underlying claims. Pac. Radiation Oncology, LLC v. Queen's Med. Ctr., 810 F.3d 631, 636 (9th Cir. 2015) (citing De Beers Consol. Mines Ltd. v. United States, 325 U.S. 212, 220 (1945)). Thus, a district court lacks authority to grant injunctive relief to address matters that have no relationship or nexus to the claims set forth in the underlying complaint. Id.

If Plaintiff intends to seek preliminary injunctive relief, he must file and note a motion with the Court, in compliance with Local Civil Rule 7, explaining why he is entitled to relief under the above standards, and have the motion served on Defendants.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to the parties and to the Honorable Marsha J. Pechman.


Summaries of

Simms v. Hathaway

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 14, 2023
No. C23-05068-MJP-SKV (W.D. Wash. Feb. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Simms v. Hathaway

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL JERIMIAH SIMMS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL HATHAWAY et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Feb 14, 2023

Citations

No. C23-05068-MJP-SKV (W.D. Wash. Feb. 14, 2023)