From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 27, 2023
2:21-cv-02215-TLN-DMC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02215-TLN-DMC

04-27-2023

XENIA SIMMONS; ZHANA McCULLOUGH; ARTHUR ROTTER; GENE ROTTER; DANIELLE ROTTER; and KELLY ANNE ROTTER, Plaintiffs, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

LAW OFFICES OF REINER, SLAUGHTER, MAINZER & FRANKEL, LLP Russell Reiner, State Bar No. 84461 Todd E. Slaughter, State Bar No. 87753 Benjamin H. Mainzer State Bar No. 257748 Rick Lundblade, State Bar No. 220662 April K. Stratte, State Bar No. 290423 LAW OFFICES OF MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP Alexander F. Stuart, State Bar No. 96141 Attorneys for Plaintiffs MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP ALEXANDER STUART Attorneys for Plaintiffs ROPERS MAJESKI PC BLAKE J. RUSSUM NORMAN LAU Attorneys for LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY


Complaint Filed: September 30, 2021

LAW OFFICES OF REINER, SLAUGHTER, MAINZER & FRANKEL, LLP Russell Reiner, State Bar No. 84461 Todd E. Slaughter, State Bar No. 87753 Benjamin H. Mainzer State Bar No. 257748 Rick Lundblade, State Bar No. 220662 April K. Stratte, State Bar No. 290423 LAW OFFICES OF MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP Alexander F. Stuart, State Bar No. 96141 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MURPHY AUSTIN ADAMS SCHOENFELD LLP ALEXANDER STUART Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ROPERS MAJESKI PC BLAKE J. RUSSUM NORMAN LAU Attorneys for LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER

Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 143(a)(1) and subject to the Court's approval, the parties hereto jointly stipulate to further modify the Pretrial Scheduling Order filed December 1, 2021, (ECF 3) and the Court's prior modification of the Scheduling Order (ECF 18) as detailed below. This is the second request to modify the schedule.

This stipulation is being made because, due to a calendaring mistake on the part of Defendant, Defendant requires additional time to prepare its Rule 26 expert witness disclosure and accompanying reports. The parties met and conferred regarding the additional extension and agree that a two-week extension of the present disclosure dates would facilitate expert discovery in this case while continuing to move the case forward. There is no trial date or pre-trial conference date set in this matter. There will be no inconvenience to the Court if this stipulation is granted.

Accordingly, the parties stipulate and agree to the following amendments in the scheduling order:

Event

Current Deadline

New Proposed Deadline

Disclosure of Experts

May 1, 2023

May 15, 2023

Supplemental Disclosure of Experts

May 22, 2023

June 5, 2023

Expert Discovery Cut Off

60 days after the expert's disclosure or 60 days after the Court's ruling on defendant's motion for summary judgment, whichever is later

The parties agree that all other matters contained in the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order remain unchanged.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Simmons v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 27, 2023
2:21-cv-02215-TLN-DMC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Simmons v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:XENIA SIMMONS; ZHANA McCULLOUGH; ARTHUR ROTTER; GENE ROTTER; DANIELLE…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 27, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-02215-TLN-DMC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2023)