From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. Cassady

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 22, 2014
Case No. 4:14CV01378 AGF (E.D. Mo. Oct. 22, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 4:14CV01378 AGF

10-22-2014

RICHARD C. SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. JAY CASSADY, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on two motions filed by Petitioner for appointment of counsel. There is no constitutional right for a pro se habeas petitioner to have counsel appointed, although the Court has discretion to appoint counsel when necessary. Morris v. Dormire, 217 F.3d 556, 558 (8th Cir. 2000). Among the factors a court should consider in making this determination are the factual and legal complexity of the case, the ability of the petitioner to present the facts and his claims, and the degree to which the petitioner and the Court would benefit from such an appointment. Id. Upon review of the record, the Court does not believe that the appointment of counsel is warranted here.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's motions for appointment of counsel are DENIED. (Doc. Nos. 2 and 5.)

/s/_________

AUDREY G. FLEISSIG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 22nd day of October, 2014.


Summaries of

Simmons v. Cassady

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 22, 2014
Case No. 4:14CV01378 AGF (E.D. Mo. Oct. 22, 2014)
Case details for

Simmons v. Cassady

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD C. SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. JAY CASSADY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 22, 2014

Citations

Case No. 4:14CV01378 AGF (E.D. Mo. Oct. 22, 2014)