From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simadri v. Express Capital Lending a Bus. Entity

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2011
Case No. EDCV 10-01323 VAP(DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 10-01323 VAP(DTBx)

10-26-2011

NAIDU SIMADRI AND NAIDU ASHIKA, HUSBAND AND WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS v. EXPRESS CAPITAL LENDING A BUSINESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN; UNKNOWN MORTGAGE BROKER, A BUSINIESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN; INVESTOR TITLE COMPANY, A BUSINESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC, A BUSINIESS ENTITY, FORM UNKNOWN, AND DOES 1-10 INCLUSIVE

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: NO APPEARANCE ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: NO APPEARANCE


CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL


PRESENT: HONORABLE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS , U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Marva Dillard None Present

Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: NO APPEARANCE

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: NO APPEARANCE PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than November 15, 2011, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date:

• Proof of service of summons and complaint.
• Answer by the defendant(s) or plaintiff's request for entry of default.
• Plaintiff's filing of an application to the clerk to enter default judgment or filing of a noticed motion for entry of default judgment.

In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7- 15, no oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action.


Summaries of

Simadri v. Express Capital Lending a Bus. Entity

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2011
Case No. EDCV 10-01323 VAP(DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Simadri v. Express Capital Lending a Bus. Entity

Case Details

Full title:NAIDU SIMADRI AND NAIDU ASHIKA, HUSBAND AND WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

Citations

Case No. EDCV 10-01323 VAP(DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)