From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silvers v. Silvers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 13, 1999
267 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued November 4, 1999

December 13, 1999

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated September 10, 1998, as denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the cause of action asserted by the plaintiff Derek Silvers to recover damages for breach of contract.

Ernest Codelia, P.C., Bronx, N.Y. (Peter Shipman of counsel), for appellant.

S. Jean Smith, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The language of the separation agreement dated May 26, 198 1, could reasonably be construed to have created a direct benefit for the plaintiff Derek Silvers (see, Fourth Ocean Putnam Corp. v. Interstate Wrecking Co., 66 N.Y.2d 38, 44 ; Goodman-Marks Assoc. v. Westbury Post Assoc., 70 A.D.2d 145 ). Therefore, in the absence of extrinsic evidence, it may reasonably be inferred that Derek was an intended third-party beneficiary of the agreement.

BRACKEN, J.P., THOMPSON, FRIEDMANN, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Silvers v. Silvers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 13, 1999
267 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Silvers v. Silvers

Case Details

Full title:MARIA SILVERS, plaintiff, DEREK SILVERS, respondent, v. THOMAS SILVERS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
699 N.Y.S.2d 874