From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silverman v. Caplin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1993
194 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

June 7, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Saladino, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the note of issue is stricken; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff's time to respond to the defendant's interrogatories and notice to produce is extended until 60 days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

Discovery had not been completed in this case since the plaintiff had not answered the defendant's interrogatories or complied with the notice to produce. Therefore, the action was not ready for trial and the plaintiff's note of issue should have been stricken and the case removed from the calendar (see, Salwen Paper Co. Profit Sharing Retirement Trust v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, 110 A.D.2d 895). Moreover, the record does not support the plaintiff's contention that the items requested were the duplicative equivalent of information previously turned over. Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Silverman v. Caplin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1993
194 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Silverman v. Caplin

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT SILVERMAN, Respondent, v. BRUCE CAPLIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1993

Citations

194 A.D.2d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
599 N.Y.S.2d 997

Citing Cases

CRISPINO v. HOLM-ANDERSEN

Where outstanding discovery requests remain and plaintiff files a false Statement of Readiness and Note of…

Crispino v. Holm-Andersen

See Lynch v Vollono, 6 AD3d 505 [2d Dept 2009]; see Savin v Brooklyn Marine Park Development Corp., supra at…