On remand, the trial court determined that the initial sentence was appropriate. The Court of Appeals affirmed, see id. at 359-61, and the Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, see Silverio v. United States, 555 U.S. 910 (2008). Petitioner then brought in the trial court a motion to vacate, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, in which he asserted ineffective assistance of trial counsel in connection with sentencing.
On remand, this court declined to resentence Silverio and concluded that the initial sentence was appropriate. The Court of Appeals affirmed, see id. at 359-61, and the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari, see Silverio v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 252 (2008). A subsequent motion for relief, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, was denied.
On remand, this court declined to resentence Silverio and concluded that the initial sentence was appropriate. The Court of Appeals affirmed, see id. at 359-61, and the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari, see Silverio v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 252 (2008). A subsequent motion for relief, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, was denied.