Silverio v. United States

3 Citing cases

  1. Silverio v. Hollingsworth

    Civil Action No. 14-2821(NLH) (D.N.J. Jun. 10, 2014)

    On remand, the trial court determined that the initial sentence was appropriate. The Court of Appeals affirmed, see id. at 359-61, and the Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari, see Silverio v. United States, 555 U.S. 910 (2008). Petitioner then brought in the trial court a motion to vacate, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, in which he asserted ineffective assistance of trial counsel in connection with sentencing.

  2. U.S. v. Silverio

    No. 99-CR-1044 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2011)

    On remand, this court declined to resentence Silverio and concluded that the initial sentence was appropriate. The Court of Appeals affirmed, see id. at 359-61, and the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari, see Silverio v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 252 (2008). A subsequent motion for relief, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, was denied.

  3. United States v. Silverio

    No. 99-CR-1044 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2011)

    On remand, this court declined to resentence Silverio and concluded that the initial sentence was appropriate. The Court of Appeals affirmed, see id. at 359-61, and the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari, see Silverio v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 252 (2008). A subsequent motion for relief, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, was denied.