From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silinzy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 13, 2007
216 S.W.3d 705 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. ED 88596.

March 13, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Timothy J. Wilson, Judge.

Gwenda Renee' Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Victor J. Melenbrink — co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.



ORDER


Gary Silinzy (Movant) appeals from the motion court's denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of Movant's Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted, following a jury trial, of one count of first-degree assault, one count of first-degree burglary, one count of third-degree assault, and one count of armed criminal action.

Unless otherwise indicated, all rule citations are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006.

This Court affirmed Movant's convictions in State v. Silinzy, 157 S.W.3d 326 (Mo.App.E.D.2005).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Silinzy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 13, 2007
216 S.W.3d 705 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Silinzy v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gary SILINZY, Movant/Appellant, STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Mar 13, 2007

Citations

216 S.W.3d 705 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)